Enfield Prepares for a Second Attempt at Charter Reform

Image
Enfield voters sent a clear message in November: they did not want automatic budget referendums. Now, with Democrats newly in control of the Town Council, the town is preparing to try charter reform again. The council will consider creating a new Charter Revision Commission at its meeting Monday. Collateral Damage: Bipartisan Reforms Lost in the Defeat While the budget referendum dominated the debate, several other reforms were swept away when voters rejected the entire package. Voters couldn’t “slice and dice” the proposal — there was only one up-or-down question on the ballot. What Happened in November The defeat centered largely on one controversial provision : an automatic referendum requirement whenever the town budget increased by more than 5% over the previous year’s general fund expenditures. This “trigger” would have taken budget approval out of the Council’s hands and sent it directly to voters whenever a spending proposal crossed that threshold. The charter revision question...

Ban gun purchases for people under 21


Ban gun purchases for people under 21 is something Congress should act on. That's one big step since teens are responsible for a disproportionate share of school shootings. Until then, any 18 year who buys an AR-15 and a load of ammunition ought to be an automatic red flag. Unfortunately, the median age of school shooters is 16. That might make a case for requiring gun owners to store their weapons securely. The U.S. Secret Service studied school shootings and what it found in 25 attacks that involved firearms:

"Nineteen attackers (76%) acquired a firearm from the home of a parent or another close relative. In half of the firearms cases (n = 12, 48%), evidence indicates the firearm was either readily accessible, or it was not secured in a meaningful way."
You combine immature and mentally ill kids who have easy access to firearms, and you have a problem. Requiring secure storage, and raising the purchase age, might help. Responsible gun owners already secure their weapons, but the gun lobby opposes any laws that mandate secure storage. They see it as an infringement on their rights. But who should have greater rights? The safety of children ought to come first.

Comments