Editorial: Enfield’s Revised Blight Ordinance Isn’t Ready for a Public Hearing

Image
  AI generated art via ChatGPT The Enfield Town Council tonight may set a public hearing date for a revised blight ordinance. In its current form, this proposal is not ready for public hearing and needs significant changes before moving forward. Anonymous Complaints While the ordinance itself still requires signed complaints, Enfield’s revised blight complaint form explicitly accepts anonymous complaints and signals that they may still be investigated. That represents a clear shift from the town’s prior policy, which discouraged anonymous filings and stated that the town was not required to investigate them. Historically, Enfield’s practice has been to reject anonymous complaints. For example, on SeeClickFix — the town’s reporting platform — a town official wrote in response to one blight complaint: “All complaints require a signature. Currently this complaint is showing anonymous. Please add your full name and contact information to this complaint.” That was the standard approach...

Enfield Can’t Outsource Its Conscience

 

Community Conversation forum May 7 2025


Sometimes you have to explain yourself. At the Community Conversations last night, I was slightly angry when speaking about the waste outsourcing issue—especially when I demanded the release of the  consulting report. That was rude of me, and I felt bad afterward. Still, my anger over outsourcing comes from years of experience.

I don’t fault the Council Republicans or Mayor Ken Nelson, who received my quiet anger, for investigating outsourcing. It’s the government's job to explore options. Many towns outsource; many reject it. But if this town thinks residents will approve it in a referendum, they’re not reading the room.

Anyone who’s worked for a sizable company likely knows someone affected by outsourcing. Few speak well of it.

As a former tech reporter at Computerworld and Informa TechTarget, I covered IT management, which often meant reporting on outsourcing. Companies rarely wanted to talk. My job was to find the IT workers losing their jobs and report what was really happening. One company was Mass Mutual.

Some employees were training their replacements. IT workers know the term: “knowledge transfer.” Their work was being moved overseas, where wages were far lower.

Mass Mutual employees called it “a never-ending funeral.” Some were close to breaking down. I heard the same from workers at Southern California Edison, Disney, the University of California, and Northeast Utilities. Those stories eventually reached Congress. That only happened because workers were brave enough to tell their stories—and because what they described wasn’t rare.

It’s hard to speak with these workers and not absorb their grief and anger. They did nothing wrong. They were good at their jobs. I suspect that’s how Public Works employees feel now. It’s brutal to lose your job to outsourcing. They don’t deserve it.

There are practical issues too. In 2021, Somers used a private contractor for trash pickup and got just one bid. At this week’s budget workshop, there were complaints about school busing costs—followed by talk of bringing busing back in-house. The irony was thick.

Republicans need to realize: outsourcing waste hauling is DOA. No one will buy it, even if you say it’ll let us hire 10 more teachers. Too many people have seen what outsourcing really means. The human cost is real. And even if you promise no layoffs, no one will believe it. They’ll assume the jobs will disappear in time.

If outsourcing makes it to a referendum, voters will reject it, because jettisoning good workers like this crosses a line in the soul.

Comments