Editorial: A legal victory with complications

The Connecticut Superior Court ruling Tuesday validated State Rep. John Santanella's complaint. This is a clear win, and allows him to avoid an August 11 Democratic primary against his challenger, former town attorney Tom Tyler. Tyler can appeal, but absent that, Santanella can shift his focus to November. But a winning legal outcome is not the same as a winning narrative outcome. This was an honest mistake by the Tyler campaign, a consequence of some flawed official guidance and a decision to rely on that guidance. The court found that the Democratic registrar provided petition sheets four days before state law allowed, and that the state-supplied forms lacked a legally required statement from circulators on the number of signatures gathered — a defect that invalidated all of Tyler's petitions. The ruling also notes that there was no evidence the Tyler campaign exercised due diligence to confirm the official guidance. Connecticut election law doesn't allow for honest mista...
Post a Comment

The JFK vote is a great outcome for Enfield

John F. Kennedy Middle School, Enfield, CT, Nov. 6, 2018 


Enfield generally voted Republican in the mid-term contest. It was not surprising. The town backed Trump in 2016 and this time gave the Republican gubernatorial candidate, Bob Stefanowski, 52% of the vote versus 41% for the Democrat, Ned Lamont.

Enfield is part of a pattern of suburban, working class and rural towns in this state voting Republican. A major driver of this pattern is anger over taxes. It was easy to see how this might spill over to the JFK referendum. It didn't. The school bond passed by a wide margin after its 2017 defeat.

Why did voters approve it?


The proponents seemed organized. They did a good job posting signs around town. They were active on Facebook and countered opponent claims with clear facts. Posting photos of the school's temporary boiler, a truck parked with dryer-type hot air vents running into building, was visual gold.

The problems at the school were well documented and the state's plan to cover 70% of the 84 million renovation was in place -- provided the town approved it.

The school bond was approved 9,778 to 8,050, a margin of more than 1,700 votes. The complaints raised by the opposition were more general. The voiced concerns about the overall tax burden and  the total project cost. But the arguments made by the proponents were specific to the problem at hand. That's what won the day.

But there were still a lot of opponents


This vote to approve the school board was a pragmatic decision by voters. The conservative impulse in Enfield remains in place. The town plans to close other buildings in town and reduce its inventory, setting up future battles. Generally, most people will support strong, decisive action to cut costs but they will be split over how to do.  The JFK bonding will help put the wind in the sails of those demanding the strongest action.

Future battles aside, the JFK bonding vote was a great outcome for Enfield and town residents should be proud.

The town recently completed a complete renovation of Enfield High School. The two major schools that take care of the town's kids from the 6th grade to graduation will become first class facilities, and this should improve Enfield as an attractive place for young parents. A good town just got a little better.

Comments

Post a Comment