Enfield Things

The Connecticut Superior Court ruling Tuesday validated State Rep. John Santanella's complaint. This is a clear win, and allows him to avoid an August 11 Democratic primary against his challenger, former town attorney Tom Tyler. Tyler can appeal, but absent that, Santanella can shift his focus to November. But a winning legal outcome is not the same as a winning narrative outcome. This was an honest mistake by the Tyler campaign, a consequence of some flawed official guidance and a decision to rely on that guidance. The court found that the Democratic registrar provided petition sheets four days before state law allowed, and that the state-supplied forms lacked a legally required statement from circulators on the number of signatures gathered — a defect that invalidated all of Tyler's petitions. The ruling also notes that there was no evidence the Tyler campaign exercised due diligence to confirm the official guidance. Connecticut election law doesn't allow for honest mista...

Image from lawsuit. What the lawsuit is seeking. Tom Tyler, the former town attorney, has gathered enough signatures to challenge state Rep. John Santanella in a Democratic primary. But there is now an effort being made to invalidate the challenge. In a lawsuit filed this week in Connecticut Superior Court, Santanella is arguing that election rules were violated. If he succeeds, the primary challenge may be tossed out. The Tyler campaign is saying that they followed the rules and guidance they received from town officials.  The lawsuit was brought to light by Tyler, who posted on Facebook that Santanella was seeking to remove him from the ballot. Specifically, the suit claims the Democratic registrar provided petition sheets four days before state law allowed. To challenge Santanella, Tyler needed 225 signatures; 299 were accepted. Santanella’s lawsuit seeks to invalidate the petition sheets allegedly provided early, which could leave Tyler short of the number needed to appear on t...