Enfield Square Redevelopment: What Enfield Could Have Asked For—And Didn’t

Image
The town approved millions in public support—without tying the deal to walkability, entertainment, or shared spaces residents said they wanted. Proposed project presented to Town Council last year. The Target store is to the right rear. Redeveloping Enfield Square is critical. Once our downtown—a hub of activity and identity—the mall is now a shell of its former self. In public comments and a survey of over 1,000 people, residents voiced a clear desire for the redevelopment: not just retail, but gathering places—entertainment venues, a movie theater, live music, family-friendly spaces, and walkability. Yet on June 2, when Enfield had the most leverage, the Town Council approved a generous package of financial incentives without securing any binding commitments to many of those community goals. Progress, But Not Vision   For sure, the town is taking steps to address the problems at Enfield Square.  The developer, Woodsonia Acquisitions, will redevelop the site into a mix of hou...
Post a Comment

Is Enfield considering privatizing trash removal? Let's discuss.

 

Recent discussions in the Enfield CT Open Forum have sparked concerns about a potential plan to privatize the town's trash removal services. This originated from a union post suggesting this idea might be under consideration. While details remain incomplete, the implications could be significant for our community, and we need clarity before any decisions are made.

Current service excellence

Enfield’s municipal trash pickup has long been a model of reliability and quality. Our town’s workers know the community, understand our unique needs, and deliver consistent, dependable service week after week. These relationships and local knowledge are assets that cannot be easily replaced.

Questions that need answers

Financial impact and analysis

  • Has the town conducted a thorough cost-benefit analysis of privatization?

  • Are there multi-year projections to show the expected return on investment?

  • How would privatization affect long-term cost stability for residents?

  • What will happen to the town’s current investment in trash removal equipment?

  • Have officials consulted other towns’ experiences—both successes and challenges—with privatizing similar services?

Workforce considerations

  • What is the plan for our current union employees?

  • How does this proposal align with Enfield’s broader workforce goals?

Oversight and control

  • How will the town ensure quality control if trash removal is privatized?

  • What mechanisms will be in place to hold private contractors accountable for performance issues?

  • Will the town retain enough oversight to protect residents’ interests?

The bigger picture

Budget concerns are always valid, but is privatization the right solution? Enfield’s primary financial hurdle is economic development, not service delivery costs. Privatizing trash removal might save some money in the short term, but it could cost us in other ways—like losing local control and the expertise of experienced municipal workers. Contracted services often lack the flexibility and accountability we currently enjoy.

Transparency is critical

This decision affects every resident of Enfield and demands full transparency. Our community is filled with professionals who have firsthand experience with outsourcing—both its benefits and its pitfalls. The town should publish any analysis or proposals under consideration to allow for a well-informed public discussion. If necessary, residents may need to use FOIA requests to bring this information to light.

Let’s make informed choices

Before we consider privatization, we must demand a clear, data-driven case that addresses all potential impacts—financial, operational, and community-based. Privatizing services is a significant change, and we owe it to ourselves and future generations to make this decision carefully, based on complete information.


Comments

Post a Comment