The Public Deserves to See the Trash Outsourcing Report

Image
Art generated by AI following author's prompt: Report locked in safe The Enfield Town Council is considering a consequential issue: outsourcing our public works trash removal service. However, the town has not released the consultant's report, which likely examines the pros and cons of such a move, even as the Council begins its budget deliberations. The town council authorized the hiring of the consultants in November, 2024. On April 7, 2025, the Town Council discussed the report in executive session. I submitted a Freedom of Information Act request for a report copy this week. The Town Manager's office responded that the report is still in draft format and is not eligible for public disclosure under the Connecticut Freedom of Information Act. I was also told: "The contract has not provided us a completion date at this time." That means the report could be withheld from the public indefinitely. Draft is not an automatic exemption This was my response: "My un...

Climate change and increasing housing density, my testimony on SB 1024



Enfield CT, winter sunset


The hearing on this legislation is Monday, March 15. Here is my submitted testimony: 

Dear Sen. Cassano, and Rep. McCarthy Vahey, and members of the Planning and Development Committee.

I'm writing concerning bill S.B. 1024, specifically its provision to increase density around transit and middle housing. I fully support these provisions. Thank you for the opportunity to comment.

We are in the early stages of catastrophic climate change. We see rising temperatures, storms of enormous power, unusual weather generally, drying conditions that fuel fires, rising seas, and other climate-related problems.

Over the coming decades, climate changes will prompt a northern migration. It may well be the most significant driver of growth in our state in the next 50 years.

Climate change is our problem as well. Our average temperature has increased 2.8 degrees Fahrenheit from 1970-2018. (See Climate Central April 2019, Earth Day report).

Along with Rhode Island, Connecticut is one of the fastest warming states because of the influences of the coastal waters.

But even in this climate change era, Connecticut and New England generally will be in an excellent position to grow the population as Americans relocate from more distressed parts of the nation.

Connecticut needs to prepare for this future and increase housing density near transit.

The state relies heavily on oil heat for our homes. Oil heat will become unaffordable because of a likely carbon tax. Oil heat will not be sustainable long-term, which will be a significant problem for the state's families. People will need to spend thousands upgrading heating systems, add solar and retrofit their homes for green energy. Higher densities can help address this.

Property taxes are high. Allowing people to create rental accessory apartments will help people stay in their homes, as well as pay for energy upgrades.

Connecticut needs to develop into a green state with new energy sources and higher-density housing. Although affordability and decreasing segregation drive much of this discussion around this bill, we can't ignore the climate change impacts.

Climate change will radically shape our world and prompt us to move to higher densities, less restrictive zoning, and help affordability goals.

References and notes:

This bill is unlikely to have a major impact on Enfield. We already allow high density housing near mass transit. Most of the concern about this bill is focused in Fairfield County. Enfield has a base of affordable housing, and multi-family housing. 

These links offer a variety of views on the legislation. 






Activist group leading change, Desegregate Connecticut. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fix it or face foreclosure: Enfield’s blight ordinance targets minor issues

Image
  Chipped paint on Town Hall is blight under the town's proposed blight ordinance Imagine being fined $100 a day because your lawn grew too tall while you were in the hospital. Under Enfield's proposed blight ordinance, this nightmare could become a reality for many residents. The Town Council will consider this revised ordinance at its Monday night meeting—but as written, it could harm hundreds of residents over minor cosmetic issues, from overgrown grass to temporary home repairs. While it's reasonable to address properties that pose genuine health and safety risks, this ordinance goes too far by treating cosmetic issues as equally severe. For example, if grass or weeds grow taller than 12 inches, the town can issue a citation requiring correction within 10 days. If it's not addressed in time, the property maintenance inspector can impose fines of $100 a day—with no cap—until the problem is resolved. In extreme cases, these escalating fines could even lead to foreclos...
Read more

Why is Enfield in trouble? Facts with a dose of sarcasm

Image
Molly at School Rally People are going after spending in Enfield and trying to dissect it to see where they can find gross mismanagement. Since the Republicans have been in control for all but two of the last 16 years, let's assume that the town's spending is pristine and error-free and beyond reproach—except for the two years when the Democrats were in charge. As we all know, the Democrats dumped money out of the windows of Town Hall. The Town Council Republicans are going to try to set a token reduction in the Mill Rate. To reach that point, they may have to do some problematic things, such as deferring spending on things like police cruiser replacements and equipment generally, putting off some maintenance, and not filling vacancies and laying off where they can, and who knows what else. There's a lot they can't touch, namely contractual salary obligations. But they want to be able to say that they reduced taxes. More concerning will be how much of the costs are bein...
Read more

Enfield to Pay Over $1 Million in Legal Fees After Violating Disability Rights

Image
AI generated art  Enfield is on the hook for more than $1 million in legal fees after a federal court ruled that the town and its Board of Education violated federal disability laws by failing to accommodate Sarah Hernandez, an autistic and deaf elected official. In 2017, Ms. Hernandez was a newly elected school board member. Instead of providing reasonable accommodations for her to participate in board meetings fully, the town chose to fight a multi-year federal legal battle. After about five years, a U.S. District Court jury ruled in January 2024 that Enfield discriminated against Ms. Hernandez in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). She won little in damages from the court, but the court later issued a permanent injunction requiring the town not to discriminate against people with disabilities. The town had to pay her legal cost, and that bill has arrived. On March 7, the U.S. District Court in Bridgeport ordered Enfield to pay $964,366 in attorneys' fees and ...
Read more